Skip to content
Gratistack, home
Menu

Cursor vs Visual Studio Code

Cursor and Visual Studio Code, one of its free alternatives, side by side.

Side by side

Cursor vs Visual Studio Code: facts
FactCursorVisual Studio Code
LicenseLicense: Free tierLicense: Open sourceMIT
MaintenanceStatus: VerifiedStatus: Unknown
WindowsYesYes
macOSYesYes
LinuxYesYes
WebNoYes
Command lineYesNo
Self-hostableNoNo
Works offlineNoYes
No account neededNoYes
Parity with CursorThe reference58%

License classes: Free tier and Open source. Status rules: Active means a commit in the last 90 days. See the methodology.

Feature parity with Cursor

How Visual Studio Code covers what people use Cursor for.

Feature parity with Cursor
FeatureVisual Studio Code
Editing
Tab completion that predicts your next editPartialNote 1
Agents
Agent that edits several files and runs commandsPartialNote 2
Cloud agents that work in the backgroundNoNote 3
Context
Codebase indexing and contextPartialNote 4
Models
Choice of several AI modelsYesNote 5
Customization
MCP servers and project rulesYesNote 6
Parity score58%
  1. Visual Studio Code, Tab completion that predicts your next edit: Copilot Free gives inline completions capped at 2,000 a month
  2. Visual Studio Code, Agent that edits several files and runs commands: Agent mode in Copilot Free has limited use; the Cline extension adds an agent with your own keys
  3. Visual Studio Code, Cloud agents that work in the background: Copilot's cloud agent needs a paid plan
  4. Visual Studio Code, Codebase indexing and context: Workspace context works in Copilot chat; indexing is less thorough
  5. Visual Studio Code, Choice of several AI models: Cline and other extensions connect to any provider with your own key
  6. Visual Studio Code, MCP servers and project rules: MCP servers and custom instruction files are supported

All free alternatives to Cursor